fix(bluebubbles): prevent message routing to group chats when targeting phone numbers
When sending a message to a phone number like +12622102921, the resolveChatGuidForTarget function was finding and returning a GROUP CHAT containing that phone number instead of a direct DM chat. The bug was in the participantMatch fallback logic which matched ANY chat containing the phone number as a participant, including groups. This fix adds a check to ensure participantMatch only considers DM chats (identified by ';-;' separator in the chat GUID). Group chats (identified by ';+;' separator) are now explicitly excluded from handle-based matching. If a phone number only exists in a group chat (no direct DM exists), the function now correctly returns null, which causes the send to fail with a clear error rather than accidentally messaging a group. Added test case to verify this behavior.
This commit is contained in:
parent
626a37f1ce
commit
f997a3f395
@ -187,6 +187,47 @@ describe("send", () => {
|
||||
expect(result).toBe("iMessage;-;+15551234567");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("returns null when handle only exists in group chat (not DM)", async () => {
|
||||
// This is the critical fix: if a phone number only exists as a participant in a group chat
|
||||
// (no direct DM chat), we should NOT send to that group. Return null instead.
|
||||
mockFetch
|
||||
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
json: () =>
|
||||
Promise.resolve({
|
||||
data: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
guid: "iMessage;+;group-the-council",
|
||||
participants: [
|
||||
{ address: "+12622102921" },
|
||||
{ address: "+15550001111" },
|
||||
{ address: "+15550002222" },
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
})
|
||||
// Empty second page to stop pagination
|
||||
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
json: () => Promise.resolve({ data: [] }),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const target: BlueBubblesSendTarget = {
|
||||
kind: "handle",
|
||||
address: "+12622102921",
|
||||
service: "imessage",
|
||||
};
|
||||
const result = await resolveChatGuidForTarget({
|
||||
baseUrl: "http://localhost:1234",
|
||||
password: "test",
|
||||
target,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Should return null, NOT the group chat GUID
|
||||
expect(result).toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("returns null when chat not found", async () => {
|
||||
mockFetch.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
|
||||
@ -257,11 +257,17 @@ export async function resolveChatGuidForTarget(params: {
|
||||
return guid;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!participantMatch && guid) {
|
||||
const participants = extractParticipantAddresses(chat).map((entry) =>
|
||||
normalizeBlueBubblesHandle(entry),
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (participants.includes(normalizedHandle)) {
|
||||
participantMatch = guid;
|
||||
// Only consider DM chats (`;-;` separator) as participant matches.
|
||||
// Group chats (`;+;` separator) should never match when searching by handle/phone.
|
||||
// This prevents routing "send to +1234567890" to a group chat that contains that number.
|
||||
const isDmChat = guid.includes(";-;");
|
||||
if (isDmChat) {
|
||||
const participants = extractParticipantAddresses(chat).map((entry) =>
|
||||
normalizeBlueBubblesHandle(entry),
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (participants.includes(normalizedHandle)) {
|
||||
participantMatch = guid;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user