When native slash commands are executed in Telegram topics/forums, the
originating topic context was not being preserved. This caused sub-agent
announcements to be delivered to the wrong topic.
Root cause: Native slash command context did not set OriginatingChannel
and OriginatingTo, causing session delivery context to fallback to the
user's personal ID instead of the group ID + topic.
Fix: Added OriginatingChannel and OriginatingTo to native slash command
context, ensuring topic information is preserved for sub-agent announcements.
Related session fields:
- lastThreadId: preserved via MessageThreadId
- lastTo: now correctly set to group ID via OriginatingTo
- deliveryContext: includes threadId for proper routing
In containers, PIDs can be recycled quickly after restarts. When a container
restarts, a different process might get the same PID as the previous gateway,
causing the lock check to incorrectly think the old gateway is still running.
This fix adds isGatewayProcess() which verifies on Linux that the PID actually
belongs to a clawdbot gateway by checking /proc/PID/cmdline. If the cmdline
doesn't contain 'clawdbot' or 'gateway', we assume the lock is stale.
Fixes gateway boot-loop in Docker/Fly.io deployments.
- Integrate message_sending hook into Telegram delivery path
- Send text first, then audio as voice message after
- Add /tts_provider command to switch between OpenAI and ElevenLabs
- Implement automatic fallback when primary provider fails
- Use gpt-4o-mini-tts as default OpenAI model
- Add hook integration to route-reply.ts for other channels
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Address reviewer feedback: slash commands now use the same
hasExplicitConfig check as regular messages, so unlisted
channels are allowed under groupPolicy: "open" for both
message handling and slash commands.
## Summary
Fix Slack `groupPolicy: "open"` to allow unlisted channels even when `channels.slack.channels` contains custom entries.
## Problem
When `groupPolicy` is set to `"open"`, the bot should respond in **any channel** it's invited to. However, if `channels.slack.channels` contains *any* entries—even just one channel with a custom system prompt—the open policy is ignored. Only explicitly listed channels receive responses; all others get an ephemeral "This channel is not allowed" error.
### Example config
```json
{
"channels": {
"slack": {
"groupPolicy": "open",
"channels": {
"C0123456789": { "systemPrompt": "Custom prompt for this channel" }
}
}
}
}
```
With this config, the bot only responds in `C0123456789`. Messages in any other channel are blocked—even though the policy is `"open"`.
## Root Cause
In `src/slack/monitor/context.ts`, `isChannelAllowed()` has two sequential checks:
1. `isSlackChannelAllowedByPolicy()` — correctly returns `true` for open policy
2. A secondary `!channelAllowed` check — was blocking channels when `resolveSlackChannelConfig()` returned `{ allowed: false }` for unlisted channels
The second check conflated "channel not in config" with "channel explicitly denied."
## Fix
Use `matchSource` to distinguish explicit denial from absence of config:
```ts
const hasExplicitConfig = Boolean(channelConfig?.matchSource);
if (!channelAllowed && (params.groupPolicy !== "open" || hasExplicitConfig)) {
return false;
}
```
When `matchSource` is undefined, the channel has no explicit config entry and should be allowed under open policy.
## Behavior After Fix
| Scenario | Result |
|----------|--------|
| `groupPolicy: "open"`, channel unlisted | ✅ Allowed |
| `groupPolicy: "open"`, channel explicitly denied (`allow: false`) | ❌ Blocked |
| `groupPolicy: "open"`, channel with custom config | ✅ Allowed |
| `groupPolicy: "allowlist"`, channel unlisted | ❌ Blocked |
## Test Plan
- [x] Open policy + unlisted channel → allowed
- [x] Open policy + explicitly denied channel → blocked
- [x] Allowlist policy + unlisted channel → blocked
- [x] Allowlist policy + listed channel → allowed
